Scholarly communication and bibliometrics
نویسندگان
چکیده
Why devote an ARIST chapter to scholarly communication and bibliometrics, and why now? Bibliometrics already is a frequently covered ARIST topic, with chapters such as that by White and McCain (1989) on bibliometrics generally, White and McCain (1997) on visualization of literatures, Wilson and Hood (2001) on informetric laws, and Tabah (2001) on literature dynamics. Similarly, scholarly communication has been addressed in other ARIST chapters such as Bishop and Star (1996) on social informatics and digital libraries, Schamber (1994) on relevance and information behavior, and many earlier chapters on information needs and uses. More than a decade ago, the first author addressed the intersection of scholarly communication and bibliometrics with a journal special issue and an edited book (Borgman, 1990; Borgman & Paisley, 1989), and she recently examined interim developments (Borgman, 2000a, 2000c). This review covers the decade (1990–2000) since the comprehensive 1990 volume, citing earlier works only when necessary to explain the foundation for recent developments. Given the amount of attention these topics have received, what is new and exciting enough to warrant a full chapter in 2001? What is new is that electronic scholarly communication is reaching critical mass, and CHAPTER 1
منابع مشابه
Scholarly communication and bibliometrics: I. Scholarly communication model Literature Review
This article represents a literature review that has two parts. Her is talking about the first part: scholarly communication model. In recent years there has been a resurgence of interest both in scholarly communication as a research area and in the application of bibliometrics as a research method. This article is a compilation of scholarly communication models at the intersection of scholarly...
متن کاملRankings Web , including the Webometrics Ranking of Universities
The Lab starts to work on metrics for evaluation of science and technology about 20 years ago, moving from bibliometrics to webometrics in mid-nineties when Internet became an important tool for scholarly communication. In these two decades the Lab members have published about two hundred papers in peer reviewed journals, participating in about 100 international scientific conferences, attendin...
متن کاملResearch Data Explored II: the Anatomy and Reception of figshare
Introduction We are currently witnessing a change in scholarly communication. Next to the paper, complementary materials, such as research data, source code, and images are regarded as important outcomes that should be shared and built upon (Kraker et al., 2011). In this new ecosystem, many archives have been established that cater to the needs of a digital and open science. With the increasing...
متن کاملModels of Scholarly Communication and Citation Analysis
Informetric/bibliometric analyses have to a large extent been relying on an assumption that research is essentially cumulative in its nature, which is not the least visible in the rational for using citation analyses to assess quality of research. However, when reviewing both the theoretical literature on how research is organized and studies analyzing the structures of research fields through ...
متن کاملFour-facets study of scholarly communities: artifact, producer, concept, and gatekeeper
This short paper compares the clustering of journals through three elements identified by Borgman (1989) as the main variables for bibliometric research: artifacts, producers, and concepts. In addition, this work extends this framework by adding “gatekeepers” as a variable. Fifty-eight journals from Information Science and Library Science (IS/LS) category in Journal Citation Reports were studie...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- ARIST
دوره 36 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002